Overview

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

8.2

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

85.5 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

89.5 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 85.5%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 1.0 0.5 1.4 0.6 0.2 1.2 3.4 8.4 83.9% 0.9
Article, other NA NA NA NA 1.5 NA NA 1.5 100.0% 0.9
Conference paper, peer review 3.0 3.8 3.6 3.7 1.6 3.6 3.3 22.5 86.2% 0.9
Conference paper, other 0.6 0.5 NA NA 0.4 NA 0.5 2.1 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book 0.5 NA 0.5 NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 1.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 4 2 6 3 1 4 14 34 82.4% 1
Article, other NA NA NA NA 3 NA NA 3 100.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 11 12 15 10 7 13 9 77 87.0% 1
Conference paper, other 3 1 NA NA 2 NA 2 8 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 1 NA 1 NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 4.0 29.0 7.3 1.2 31.0%
2015 4.3 8.9 2.1 2.5 58.1%
2016 4.8 27.2 5.6 0.7 14.5%
2017 3.7 15.0 4.0 1.2 33.5%
2018 3.0 4.4 1.5 0.8 25.3%
Total 19.8 84.4 4.3 6.4 32.4%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 2.9 3.63 1.1 37.6%
2015-2017 2.3 2.44 0.7 32.4%
2016-2018 2.0 2.45 0.7 36.4%
2017-2019 1.5 2.05 0.6 43.3%
Total 4.4 3.10 1.7 39.5%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.2%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 72.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 2.7 1.50 1.3 47.1%
2015-2017 1.8 1.64 1.0 59.0%
2016-2018 1.5 1.78 1.1 70.4%
2017-2019 1.2 4.46 1.0 83.8%
2018-2020 3.7 2.16 1.2 32.9%
Total 6.5 1.89 2.6 40.2%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 72.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 12 0 0.0% 7 58.3%
2015-2017 10 0 0.0% 6 60.0%
2016-2018 9 0 0.0% 6 66.7%
2017-2019 6 0 0.0% 6 100.0%
2018-2020 13 2 15.4% 13 100.0%
Total 27 2 7.4% 22 81.5%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 73.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 26 25 1 0 0 6.0
Switzerland 7 6 1 0 0 1.9
United Kingdom 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
Belgium 5 5 0 0 0 1.3
Germany 5 5 0 0 0 1.1
China 6 5 1 0 0 1.0
Italy 3 1 2 0 0 0.7
Japan 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
Spain 2 1 1 0 0 0.5
Denmark 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Slovenia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Örebro University University Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 1.3
University of Liège University Belgium 5 5 0 0 0 1.3
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) University Switzerland 5 5 0 0 0 1.3
University of California, Berkeley University United States 6 5 1 0 0 1.2
Yale University University United States 6 6 0 0 0 1.1
University of Massachusetts University United States 4 4 0 0 0 1.0
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology University China 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Stanford University University United States 4 3 1 0 0 0.9
Linnaeus University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
University of Birmingham University United Kingdom 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
City University of New York University United States 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
University of Bristol University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Rice University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University of Tokyo University Japan 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
ABB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
ABB Future Labs NA Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
College of Staten Island (CSI) University College United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies University Italy 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Imperial College London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Inria Institute France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Carnegie Mellon University University United States 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) Institute Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
University of Cassino and Southern Lazio University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
University of Salerno University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.3
Aalborg University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Amazon Inc Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH) University Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
German Aerospace Center (DLR) Other Public Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Intel Corporation Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Jaume I University University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Jozef Stefan Institute Institute Slovenia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Southern Denmark University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Washington University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Univrses Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Uppsala University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Vicarious Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Aalto University University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chinese University of Hong Kong University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stockholm University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Technology Sydney University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Vienna University of Technology University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Google AI NA United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NVIDIA Res NA United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Sheffield University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Utah University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Hong Kong University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Southern California University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Google Inc Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Johns Hopkins University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Other United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Shanghai Jiao Tong University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Singular Univ University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Texas A&M University–Commerce University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of California, San Diego University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 14 10 0 0 10 0 4 71.4%
2015 12 5 0 1 3 1 7 41.7%
2016 21 13 0 1 12 0 8 61.9%
2017 13 7 1 2 3 1 6 53.8%
2018 8 5 1 0 3 1 3 62.5%
2019 16 7 0 0 7 0 9 43.8%
2020 22 18 3 5 10 0 4 81.8%
Total 106 65 5 9 48 3 41 61.3%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

COLLABORATIVE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.7 169.2 45.3 0.0 0.0%
2015 3.4 49.0 14.3 0.6 17.0%
2016 4.7 108.4 23.1 0.0 0.0%
2017 3.1 59.4 19.4 0.2 8.2%
2018 3.2 21.1 6.7 0.5 15.8%
2019 4.2 42.2 9.9 1.0 23.2%
2020 5.8 19.6 3.4 1.8 30.2%
Total 28.1 468.9 16.7 4.1 14.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 8 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 76.3%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 11.9 2.83 4.2 35.6%
2015-2017 11.2 2.30 3.8 34.2%
2016-2018 9.1 2.53 3.3 36.5%
2017-2019 7.8 2.28 3.0 38.5%
Total 19.7 2.61 7.2 36.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 84.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 10.1 1.46 6.4 64.0%
2015-2017 8.9 1.45 5.3 59.6%
2016-2018 7.8 1.57 5.8 74.1%
2017-2019 6.4 2.09 3.6 56.1%
2018-2020 9.3 1.85 5.7 60.6%
Total 21.4 1.67 13.1 61.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 84.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 46 1 2.2% 23 50.0%
2015-2017 43 1 2.3% 24 55.8%
2016-2018 39 1 2.6% 25 64.1%
2017-2019 34 1 2.9% 23 67.6%
2018-2020 41 3 7.3% 30 73.2%
Total 98 4 4.1% 60 61.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 34 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 91.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row